9/11 CitizensWatch

January 23, 2006

Oxford Union Society: “Was 911 a Conspiracy” — Former MI5 Agents in UK to Scrutinize Official Narrative

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 11:47 pm

Press Release:

Monday 23 January

Oxford Union Society: “Was 911 a Conspiracy”

Today one of the world’s most famous debating forums will consider the taboo

question at the heart of the war on terror. Is the official Washington story

of the 911 attacks correct, or is 911 a myth created by Washington’s

military industrial complex to justify a generation of lucrative wars?

The Oxford Union has invited 911 sceptics David Shayler and Annie Machon,

both ex-MI5 officers, Ian Henshall co-author of non-fiction best-seller 911

Revealed, and risk analyst Bill Durodié to discuss whether the attacks

occurred in anything like the way the mainstream Washington news

organisations claim.

Ian Henshall said today:

After the WMD fiasco, newsrooms have so far been unwilling to ask whether

they were duped by their intelligence sources over 911 as well. So much

evidence has been seized by the US authorities and never made public that it

is impossible to say for sure how the 911 attacks happened. There are now

several versions of the official story which stand in open conflict with

each other. Many believe the attacks were manipulated or allowed to succeed

and quite a lot of evidence has leaked out to support this.

Notes

for more details of this evening’s forum and the Oxford Union contact

details see

http://www.oxford-union.org/termcard.php?PHPSESSID=babb6829c6917b573094c3304

cc68e2e

Ian Henshall can be contacted on 01273 326862 daytime. His book 911 revealed

co-authored with Rowland Morgan was given favourable reviews in the Daily

Mail and the Sunday Times, but although it is a non-fiction best-seller it

has so far been ignored by the mainstream broadcast media, despite their

legal obligation to due impartiality.

The official 911 story has never been tested in a court of law, while

crucial evidence has been seized by the FBI and ferociously withheld from

the media, and even from the families of the victims. The official 911

Commission whas been denounced even by pro-war Republican Senators after it

emerged last year that alleged 911 ringleader Mohammed Atta had been known

to the US authorities prior to 911, contrary to the assertions of the

Commission’s final report. Recently Senator Barbara Boxer stated that the

truth of the 911 attacks must be pursued wherever it leads.

Since the 911 attacks internet sites, books and alternative news media have

criticised the official conspiracy theory which holds that the attacks were

carried out by a highly skilled terrist cell acting on the under the orders

of mastermind Osama Bin Laden. Some hold that the attacks were a Pentagon

organised hoax along the lines of the documented Pentagon 1960′s plan

Operation Northwoods. This which would have used a drone aircraft to fake a

shootdown of a passenger airliner over Cuba and create the pretext for a US

invasion.

Most 911 sceptics however hold that elements in the US government took over

one of Osama Bin Laden’s many half-baked plans, made sure it worked and

possibly embellished it by a fake attack on the Pentagon’s only unoccupied

section or controlled demolitions of the three World Trade Centre buildings.

They cite the anthrax attacks purporting to be from Al Qaeda which

heightened the war panic in 2001. The anthrax terror, aimed at Senators who

were questioning the 911 war plans, was quickly forgotten after being traced

to US biowarfare laboratories.

911 sceptics say it is absolutely predictable that with war looming against

Iran and the Republicans facing meltdown in the midterms another fuzzy

audiotape should have emerged last week with new threats from Osama Bin

Laden, the man who US troops allowed to escape from Afghanistan. Even on CNN

commentators recently agreed that the language purporting to come from Bin

Laden is now quite different from his original statements. Software exists

which, given a sample of a voice, can generate new speech apparently spoken

by the same person.

—————————————————————————-

All comment is written in a strictly personal capacity.

From Ian Henshall, co-author 911 Revealed, publisher of Crisis Newsletter

and www.911dossier.co.uk. He is also proprietor of Coffee Plant

(www.coffee.uk.com) and chair of INK, the trade organisation for the UK

alternative print media (www.ink.uk.com).

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress